|
|
|
|
|
| The U.S. SMID Cap Value strategy typically consists of common stocks of companies whose market capitalizations primarily fall within that of the Russell 2500 index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| As of June 30, 2010 |
 |
|
|
|
YTD |
|
1
Year |
|
3
Years |
|
Since
Inception |
|
Inception
Date1 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/31/06 |
|
| Epoch Gross Return |
|
-10.8% |
|
19.0% |
|
-7.2% |
|
-0.9% |
|
|
|
| Epoch Net Return |
|
-11.0% |
|
17.8% |
|
-8.1% |
|
-1.9% |
|
|
|
| Russell 2500 |
|
-10.0% |
|
24.0% |
|
-8.0% |
|
-1.8% |
|
|
|
| Russell 2500V |
|
-10.2% |
|
26.5% |
|
-9.3% |
|
-3.5% |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Risk Statistics Since Inception
(August 31, 2006 - June 30, 2010)2 |
 |
|
|
|
Annual
Standard
Deviation |
|
Sharpe
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
Information
Ratio |
|
Alpha |
|
Beta |
|
R-Squared |
 |
| Epoch |
|
21.2 |
|
-0.1 |
|
 |
|
Epoch vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Russell 2500 |
|
23.0 |
|
-0.2 |
|
|
Russell 2000 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.0 |
| Russell 2500V |
|
23.4 |
|
-0.2 |
|
|
Russell 2000V |
|
0.4 |
|
2.0 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.9 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|